RLHF is the standard approach to aligning LLMs. However, recent advances in offline alignment methods, such as direct preference optimization (DPO) and its variants, call into question the need for policy-based sampling in RLHF. Offline methods, which align LLMs using pre-existing datasets without active online interaction, have demonstrated practical effectiveness and are simpler and less expensive to implement. This raises the question of whether online RL is essential to AI alignment. Comparing online and offline methods is complex due to their different computational requirements, requiring careful calibration of the budget spent to fairly measure performance.
Google DeepMind researchers demonstrated that online methods outperform offline methods in their initial experiments, leading to further investigation into this performance gap. Through controlled experiments, they found that factors such as coverage and quality of offline data were expected to fully explain the discrepancy. Unlike online methods, offline methods excel at pairwise classification but require help with generation. The discrepancy persists regardless of the type of loss function and the scale of the model. This suggests that policy-based sampling is crucial for AI alignment, highlighting the challenges of offline alignment. The study uses KL divergence versus supervised fine-tuning (SFT) policy to compare the performance of algorithms and budgets, revealing persistent differences.
The study complements previous work on RLHF by comparing online and offline RLHF algorithms. The researchers identify a persistent performance gap between online and offline methods, even when using different loss functions and scaling policy networks. While previous studies have noted challenges in offline RLHF, their results highlight that they extend to RLHF.
The study compares online and offline alignment methods using IPO loss on various datasets, examining their performance according to Goodhart's Law. IPO loss involves optimizing the weight of winning responses versus losing responses, with differences in sampling processes defining online and offline methods. Online algorithms sample policy responses, while offline algorithms use a fixed data set. Experiments reveal that online algorithms achieve better trade-offs between KL divergence and performance, using the KL budget more efficiently and achieving higher maximum performance. Several hypotheses are proposed to explain these discrepancies, such as diversity in data coverage and suboptimal offline datasets.
The hypothesis posits that the performance gap between online and offline algorithms can be partially attributed to the classification accuracy of the proxy preference model versus the policy itself. First, the proxy preference model tends to achieve higher classification accuracy than the policy when used as a classifier. Second, it proposes that this difference in classification accuracy contributes to the observed performance gap between online and offline algorithms. Essentially, this suggests that better classification leads to better performance, but this hypothesis needs to be further examined and validated with empirical evidence.
In conclusion, the study highlights the critical role of policy-driven sampling in effective LLM alignment and outlines the challenges associated with offline alignment approaches. Researchers have debunked several commonly held beliefs about the performance gap between online and offline algorithms through rigorous experimentation and hypothesis testing. They highlighted the importance of generating policy data to improve the effectiveness of policy learning. However, they also argue that offline algorithms can improve by adopting strategies that mimic online learning processes. This opens up avenues for further exploration, such as hybrid approaches combining the strengths of online and offline methods and deeper theoretical investigations into reinforcement learning for human feedback.
Check Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also don’t forget to follow us on Twitter. Join our Telegram channel, Discord ChannelAnd LinkedIn Groops.
If you like our work, you will love our bulletin..
Don't forget to join our 42,000+ ML subreddit
Sana Hassan, Consulting Intern at Marktechpost and a dual degree student at IIT Madras, is passionate about applying technology and AI to address real-world challenges. With a keen interest in solving practical problems, he brings a fresh perspective to the intersection of AI and real-world solutions.